EVANSTON NOW
— Aldermen get racial equity training – Bill Smith (DIERSEN: Government is
nasty. Politics is nasty. Democrats are nasty. Since 1966, my Democrat
superiors, supervisors, coworkers, and subordinates have done everything that
they could to turn minorities against me. They have always
hinted/implied/argued/shouted a) that instead of me, the Post Office should
have hired a minority in 1966, b) that the Post Office should gotten rid of me
much sooner than it did so that a minority could have my job, c) that instead
of me, IRS should have hired a minority in 1971, d) that instead of me, IRS
should have promoted minorities in 1972, 1973, and 1974, e) that instead of me,
GAO should have hired a minority in 1980, f) that instead of me, GAO should
have promoted a minority in 1986, and g) that GAO should have gotten rid of me
much sooner than it did so that a minority could have my job and my preferred
corner office. They would not have done that if I had been a Democrat,
minority, female, or veteran.) https://evanstonnow.com/story/government/bill-smith/equity/2019-10-01/83316/aldermen-get-racial-equity-training
NBC5
— ICE Detains 5 Individuals at Chicago Pizzeria, Lightfoot Says “Chicago is
and always will be a welcoming city” Lightfoot stated – Daniela
Prizont-Cado (DIERSEN: From what I see, the more of the following that you are,
the more unwelcome that you are in Chicago: Trump supporter, Protestant,
conservative, patriotic, Republican, American, White, male, older, rich, gun
owner, German American, draft avoider, and/or if your ancestors have been in
America for a long time.) https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/ICE-Detains-5-Individuals-at-Chicago-Pizza-Place-Lightfoot-Says-561158161.html
CRAIN’S CHICAGO BUSINESS
— Lightfoot’s no-toke zone makes no sense The mayor wants to declare a
potentially lucrative swath of Chicago off-limits to marijuana retailers. But
why? – JOE CAHILL (DIERSEN: Stoners and pot pushers want pot to be available
and sold everywhere.) https://www.chicagobusiness.com/joe-cahill-business/lightfoots-no-toke-zone-makes-no-sense
CHAMPAIGN/URBANA NEWS GAZETTE
— DIERSEN HEADLINE: State of Illinois department heads have been ordered to
find “operational efficiencies” that would total 6.5 percent of their current
budget. In the federal government, when agency budgets are cut, agencies get
rid of their employees who are Republican, White, male, and/or non-veteran who
did not make GS-13 (currently $98,198) by age 25, GS-14 (currently $116,040) by
age 30, GS-15 (currently $136,495) by age 35, and Senior Executive Service
(currently $165,500) by age 40. https://www.news-gazette.com/opinion/editorial-be-prepared/article_f89ae88e-5ecc-5ff7-bee3-f48d9a66115e.html
NEW YORK POST
— Watchdog Refuses to Detail Whistle-Blower Complaint About Trump – Nicholas
Fandos, Eileen Sullivan, Julian E. Barnes and Matthew Rosenberg (DIERSEN: The
Democrats who dominate the federal government took adverse actions against me
because I blew the whistle on their political affiliation discrimination,
reverse discrimination, age discrimination, and retaliation. The RINOs who
dominate the Illinois Republican Party (IRP), DuPage County Republican Central
Committee, and Milton Township Republican Central Committee continue to take
adverse actions against me because I blow the whistle on their failure/refusal
to defend and advance the IRP platform and the Republican Party platform.) https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/19/us/politics/intelligence-whistle-blower-complaint-trump.html
FORBES
— Google Is Once Again Accused Of Age Discrimination – Jack Kelly https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2019/09/19/google-is-once-again-accused-of-age-discrimination/
— Even In A Competitive Labor Market, Little Vacation For Workers – Martha
Gimbel (DIERSEN: Since 1966, when I was 18 years old, my critics/opponents,
their operatives, and their dupes have been furious a) that I got lots of
vacation days while worked part-time for the Post Office 1966-1969 and
full-time for IRS 1971-1980 and GAO 1980-1997 and b) that I got a big lump-sum
payment for lots of unused vacation days when I took an early retirement
“offer” in 1997. SEE:
OAKLAND COUNTY TIMES
— Five Apply for Short Term Ferndale Council Seat, Decision Monday – Crystal
A. Proxmire http://oaklandcounty115.com/2019/09/19/five-apply-for-short-term-ferndale-council-seat-decision-monday/ (FROM THE ARTICLE:
Applicants have the opportunity to speak to Council at the Monday, Sept. 23
meeting, and council is expected to appoint the vacancy following the
introductions. The meeting takes place at Ferndale City Hall beginning at 7pm.)
FEDERAL NEWS NETWORK
— Are Thrift Savings Plan millionaires on the endangered species list? – Mike
Causey (DIERSEN: The more money that they have in their Thrift Savings Plan,
the more that federal employees who are Republican, White, male, and/or
non-veteran who did not make Senior Executive Service (currently $165,500) by
age 40 will be forced to retire.) https://federalnewsnetwork.com/mike-causey-federal-report/2019/09/are-tsp-millionaires-on-the-endangered-species-list/
HR — How to Calculate Damages in a Slander Case (DIERSEN: I should sue those who have slandered me. Their slandering me has caused me to lose a tremendous amount of income.) https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-to-calculate-damages-in-a-slander-case-38152 (FROM THE ARTICLE: Actual damages can be calculated to a certain dollar amount. They include all those damages that the plaintiff directly suffered due to the slander. This may include lost wages, lost earning capacity or loss of business opportunities. These may include the actual amounts lost or the amounts that are likely to be lost because of the slander. To calculate lost earnings, the plaintiff can add up the wages that he or she lost from being out of work because of the slanderous statement. This also includes any employment benefits that were lost, such as using sick days or paid time off to deal with the slanderous statement. Lost earning capacity is more difficult to prove and generally requires expert testimony. An expert may have to testify about how the plaintiff’s diminished earning capacity will affect his or her lifetime earnings. For example, if a person was working a $100,000 job and the slander caused him or her to be fired and to be ostracized from the position and was only able to earn $50,000, the annual amount of damages would start at $50,000. Reasonable pay increases based on the individual’s employment record would also be taken into consideration, as well as his or her prospects for promotion. Inflation may also be taken into consideration. An expert may have to evaluate a variety of evidence in order to determine the difference between the plaintiff’s projected earnings before the slander in order to compare these with the projected earnings after the slander. The economic expert may examine the plaintiff’s tax returns, the current and projected economic state and the industry in which the plaintiff is employed and was employed. If the plaintiff was a business owner, his or her losses may include the loss of existing clients and the lost business opportunities. Former clients may be called to testify that they stopped doing business because of the slander. An economic expert may be necessary to testify about the economic impact of such lost business opportunities and business goodwill.)
